Quality Criteria Benchmark for Hyperspectral Imagery


The article related to these results was published in IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43(09),2103-2114 and is available here

For further information, you can contact me at emmanuel.christophe@tesa.prd.fr.

Signification for symbols on the curves is available here.

moffett2 for SAM classification

Aviris hyperspectral image on Moffett Fields presenting uniform areas (salt evaporators). The results of Spectral Angle Mapper classification to different degradations is compared with several quality criteria (distortion measurements).

Full results (about 400 kB)

moffett3 for SAM classification

Aviris hyperspectral image on Moffett Fields presenting urbans areas (roads, buildings, vegetation). The results of Spectral Angle Mapper classification to different degradations is compared with several quality criteria (distortion measurements).

Full results (about 400 kB)

moffett2 for Mahalanobis classification

Aviris hyperspectral image on Moffett Fields presenting uniform areas (salt evaporators). The results of Mahalanobis classification to different degradations is compared with several quality criteria (distortion measurements).

Full results (about 400 kB)

moffett2 for Maximum Likelihood classification

Aviris hyperspectral image on Moffett Fields presenting uniform areas (salt evaporators). The results of Maximum Likelihood classification to different degradations is compared with several quality criteria (distortion measurements).

Full results (about 400 kB)

Back

04-2005
- E. Christophe -